Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and, as of 20 April 2021 (Eastern Time), the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
- All categories
- Politics & Government
- 167Upvotes of all answers to this question60 AnswersPolitics14 hours ago
- 35Upvotes of all answers to this question
Does cancel-culture America really believe they can shape the country in their image using passive/aggressive force? Then what happens?
Has it even thought things through that far? Has it considered how many factions currently aligned to eradicate conservatives will refuse to play well with each other once liberalism is the only game in town?
Let’s avoid playing Devil’s Advocate locally and jump ahead where all like-minded liberals are all on the same page or at least have reached some kind of détente with each other. What happens after that? Anyone think China, Russia, Iran, North Korea and others are just going to roll-over when they see the Utopian perfection liberals have created in the U.S.?
Think you can wait to cross that bridge when you come to it? If so, you haven’t been keeping up with current events. Those countries aren’t going to wait for liberal/socialist America to get all its ducks in a row.
I expect no one will answer this question or will refuse to accept the premise if they write anything at all. It doesn’t matter anyway since this forum won’t exist soon, but I just thought some of you should think about everything that’s happening all the way through to the end.
Maybe, the world would actually be a better place if everyone would just do what liberal America says. I’m pretty certain that’s not going to happen. Y’all got a Plan ‘B’? Maybe, you should create one before marching the entirety of conservative America over the cliff's edge.15 AnswersPolitics14 hours ago
- 883Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 784Upvotes of all answers to this question
"Like many corners of the internet, Yahoo Answers has become a cesspool of conspiracy theories and outlandish questions that dragged down Yahoo's brand as it tries to move upscale. For example, one of the top questions on the website Tuesday morning asks "Is Yahoo Answers being shut down because conservatives have exposed the Socialist takeover of America?"128 AnswersPolitics4 days ago
- 24Upvotes of all answers to this questionFavourite answer:
Poland 🇵🇱 doesn't have mass shootings, terrorist attacks, a rape epidemic, grooming gangs, riots, BLM, sjw, looting, burning cities or critical race (racism against White people). Why? Because Poland 🇵🇱 is 0% black, 0% jewish, 0%muslim, 0% hispanic, 0% asian. White people in Poland 🇵🇱live in peace and harmony away from non-whites. Diversity doesn't work. White nationalism clearly works. White nationalism basically already won.12 AnswersPolitics14 hours ago
- 200Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 999+Upvotes of all answers to this question
Everyone is blaming somebody, who do you blame?462 AnswersPolitics6 days ago
- 31Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 215Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 59Upvotes of all answers to this question14 AnswersPolitics2 days ago
- 14Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 21Upvotes of all answers to this question
If the prosecution calls a witness who directly contradicts other witnesses they've called, shouldn't that be enough for reasonable doubt?
Like in the Chauvin trial, The medical examiner contradicted everything the prosecution has said to this point.
If the prosecution can't put together a coherent story why should the jury be expected to?12 AnswersLaw & Ethics23 hours ago
- 15Upvotes of all answers to this question
Many are going out to Mar a Lago to worship dear Fuhrer, thinking he will become a team player which he has proved he’s not. Do they want to lose by continuing to suck up to him?9 AnswersPolitics16 hours ago
- 818Upvotes of all answers to this question
- 14Upvotes of all answers to this question8 AnswersPolitics14 hours ago
- 12Upvotes of all answers to this question8 AnswersPolitics14 hours ago
- 4Upvotes of all answers to this question
Once the vaccines been available for everyone, long enough for them to have gotten both doses, should we reopen fully regardless of herd....?
The way I see it, in a couple months, anyone who wants the vaccine will have had time to get both doses.
Whether or not enough people have made that choice for us to reach herd immunity is no longer consequential to me.
Its not like last year when we had no vaccine and everyone could get infected.
We actually have a choice now.
We could fully reopen the world, without masks, the way things were in 2019.
And those vaccinated will still be at a very low risk of infection. Breakthrough cases do happen, but even among the few vaccinated people who do still get infected, the vaccine is preventing severe illness, hospitalization and death, even with the variants.
Two weeks after your second dose, you more or less have a 1 percent chance of getting a runny nose from this virus.
Therefore who cares about herd immunity anymore?
It will only be the anti-vaxxers getting the worst illnesses and death from covid at that point, not the rest of us.
Let them live with the consequences of their choice, while we live with the benefits of ours.
I say that by June of 2021, we make like its June of 2019 again.7 AnswersPolitics13 hours ago
- 7Upvotes of all answers to this questionFavourite answer:
Because the media cover for them. We all saw the cities burning while some lame "journalist" stood there telling us it was just "peaceful unrest". Then the govt just turns them loose to do it again.5 AnswersPolitics7 hours ago
- 41Upvotes of all answers to this question